Commentary for Bava Batra 287:7

פשיטא ייחד לו אביו בית ועלייה בית קנה עלייה לא קנה בית ואכסדרה מהו שני בתים זה לפנים מזה מהו תיקו

a house and [there is] an upper story [thereon], [the latter] acquired the ownership of the house [but] not [of] the upper story. What [is, however, the law in the case of] a house and an <i>exedra</i>?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. ');">¹⁶</span> [Or in the case of] two houses one within the other? — This is undecided. An objection was raised: [If] his father had set aside for him a house and [it contains] furniture, he acquires possession of the furniture [but] not of the house! — R. Jeremiah replied: [This refers to a case] where, for instance, his father's store[s] were kept there.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he requires it for his own purposes he would not transfer its ownership to his son. ');">¹⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 287:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.